8 of 25 sources have a recorded position.
Calls to action by source
8 recorded positions out of 25 sources. Filled markers indicate recorded positions; hollow markers mean not yet recorded. Source details follow the chart.
Source
Recorded
Not yet recorded
Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor
Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor: no position recorded in the current review
Brian Keating
Brian Keating: no position recorded in the current review
Conrad Wolfram
Conrad Wolfram: Advocates curriculum reform centered on computational thinking for the AI age.
Curt Jaimungal
Curt Jaimungal: no position recorded in the current review
David Bessis
David Bessis: Urges mathematicians to speak now, anticipate disruption, and coordinate.
Emily Riehl
Emily Riehl: Proposes testing AI systems for meaningful mathematical contribution.
Francis Su
Francis Su: no position recorded in the current review
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus: no position recorded in the current review
Geordie Williamson
Geordie Williamson: no position recorded in the current review
Jacob Tsimerman
Jacob Tsimerman: Calls for more independent AI-safety organizations, regulation, and government evaluations.
Jaron Lanier
Jaron Lanier: no position recorded in the current review
Jeremy Avigad
Jeremy Avigad: no position recorded in the current review
Jordana Cepelewicz
Jordana Cepelewicz: no position recorded in the current review
Leiden Declaration
Leiden Declaration: Sets collective governance and policy proposals for AI in mathematics.
Math and AI Declaration
Math and AI Declaration: no position recorded in the current review
Max Weinreich
Max Weinreich: Advocates total opposition to AI use in mathematics and coordinated institutional action.
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder: no position recorded in the current review
Sean Carroll
Sean Carroll: no position recorded in the current review
Stephen Wolfram
Stephen Wolfram: Advocates combining generative AI with exact symbolic and numerical computation.
Steven Strogatz
Steven Strogatz: no position recorded in the current review
Terence Tao
Terence Tao: Recommends AI-use disclosures and new workflows and infrastructure for mathematics.
The Economist
The Economist: no position recorded in the current review
Timothy Gowers
Timothy Gowers: no position recorded in the current review
Yahoo News
Yahoo News: no position recorded in the current review
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun: no position recorded in the current review
← Source categories 3 / 5 Jobs and careers → Recorded positions
Urges mathematicians to speak now, anticipate disruption, and coordinate.
Source used · Primary source verified; discusses jobs, hiring, and professional viability.
Sets collective governance and policy proposals for AI in mathematics.
Source used · Existing review notes.
Proposes testing AI systems for meaningful mathematical contribution.
Source used · Existing review notes.
Advocates combining generative AI with exact symbolic and numerical computation.
Source used · Existing review notes; primary product page verified, but its navigation links are not a source-level employment claim.
Recommends AI-use disclosures and new workflows and infrastructure for mathematics.
Source used · Primary arXiv full text verified; distinguishes research practice from explicit hiring and promotion consequences.
Calls for more independent AI-safety organizations, regulation, and government evaluations.
Source used · Primary interview/report text verified; explicitly addresses career choice, academic employment, and trainees.
Advocates total opposition to AI use in mathematics and coordinated institutional action.
Source used · Primary arXiv abstract verified; institutional proposals are explicit, but no specific employment or career claim was captured.
Advocates curriculum reform centered on computational thinking for the AI age.
Source used · Existing review notes; direct page text was inaccessible during bounded verification.
Reading this chart
“Recorded” means an explicit position is captured in the current review. “Not yet recorded” means the review does not establish a position on this topic; it does not mean the source has no opinion. These are provisional source-level classifications, not judgments of people.
A call to action recommends something people or institutions should do, rather than merely predicting AI capabilities.
People and sources · Classification data