3 of 25 sources have a recorded position.
Jobs and careers by source
3 recorded positions out of 25 sources. Filled markers indicate recorded positions; hollow markers mean not yet recorded. Source details follow the chart.
Source
Recorded
Not yet recorded
Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor
Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor: no position recorded in the current review
Brian Keating
Brian Keating: no position recorded in the current review
Conrad Wolfram
Conrad Wolfram: no position recorded in the current review
Curt Jaimungal
Curt Jaimungal: no position recorded in the current review
David Bessis
David Bessis: Discusses hiring incentives, professional status, and the viability of research mathematics as a profession.
Emily Riehl
Emily Riehl: no position recorded in the current review
Francis Su
Francis Su: no position recorded in the current review
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus: no position recorded in the current review
Geordie Williamson
Geordie Williamson: no position recorded in the current review
Jacob Tsimerman
Jacob Tsimerman: Describes a move from academia to an AI lab and says young mathematics Ph.D. trainees face a turbulent skills transition.
Jaron Lanier
Jaron Lanier: no position recorded in the current review
Jeremy Avigad
Jeremy Avigad: no position recorded in the current review
Jordana Cepelewicz
Jordana Cepelewicz: no position recorded in the current review
Leiden Declaration
Leiden Declaration: no position recorded in the current review
Math and AI Declaration
Math and AI Declaration: no position recorded in the current review
Max Weinreich
Max Weinreich: no position recorded in the current review
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder: no position recorded in the current review
Sean Carroll
Sean Carroll: no position recorded in the current review
Stephen Wolfram
Stephen Wolfram: no position recorded in the current review
Steven Strogatz
Steven Strogatz: no position recorded in the current review
Terence Tao
Terence Tao: Says proof abundance may disrupt hiring and promotion criteria built for proof scarcity.
The Economist
The Economist: no position recorded in the current review
Timothy Gowers
Timothy Gowers: no position recorded in the current review
Yahoo News
Yahoo News: no position recorded in the current review
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun: no position recorded in the current review
← Calls to action 4 / 5 Source timing →
Recorded positions
Discusses hiring incentives, professional status, and the viability of research mathematics as a profession.
Source used · Primary source verified; discusses jobs, hiring, and professional viability.
Says proof abundance may disrupt hiring and promotion criteria built for proof scarcity.
Source used · Primary arXiv full text verified; distinguishes research practice from explicit hiring and promotion consequences.
Describes a move from academia to an AI lab and says young mathematics Ph.D. trainees face a turbulent skills transition.
Source used · Primary interview/report text verified; explicitly addresses career choice, academic employment, and trainees.
Reading this chart
“Recorded” means an explicit position is captured in the current review. “Not yet recorded” means the review does not establish a position on this topic; it does not mean the source has no opinion. These are provisional source-level classifications, not judgments of people.
Jobs and careers covers employment, professional roles, training for work, and career prospects. Discussion of research methods alone is not treated as an employment forecast. The older scope-only concern-coverage count did not assess these judgments.
People and sources · Classification data